[ivory-search 404 "The search form 146633303 does not exist"]

You can now bring the dead back to life šŸ’€

Welcome to AI Collision šŸ’„,

A light-hearted, cartoonish illustration of a skull emoji transitioning into a vibrant, colorful human form, symbolizing a whimsical take on resurrection. The skull emoji on the left should have a playful expression, and as it transforms into a human on the right, the human figure should be lively and full of bright, vivid colors. The transformation should appear magical and cheerful, with a splash of various colors around the transition area, giving it a fun, lively vibe. The background should be colorful and joyful to match the overall theme.

In todayā€™s collision between AI and our world,

  • Kevin McClane and John McCallister join forces

  • Last-chance offer to join us at Predictive Edge

  • Wrong clown

If thatā€™s enough to get the souls rising, read onā€¦

AI Collision šŸ’„ how close are we to AI immortality?

I got an email last night from my friend and colleague Nick Hubble. Nickā€™s the editor over at Fortune & Freedom (if you havenā€™t seen Nickā€™s worth, I strongly suggest you go check it out).

Iā€™ve known Nick for a decade now. When I first got into financial publishing back in early 2013, the company I started with, Port Phillip Publishing (now Fat Tail Investment Research), already had an incredible roster of editors.

That roster included Dan Denning, Kris Sayce, Greg Canavan, Murray Dawes, Callum Newman, Shae Russellā€¦ a real melting pot of characters and brilliant minds.

Nick Hubble was there too. And from the outset, I always loved robust debate and discussion with Nick ā€“ heā€™s got one of the most unique perspectives on the markets that Iā€™ve ever come across.

Even though he lives in Queensland (back in Australia) and is soon heading back to live in Japan I believe, and I now live in Portugal, we are always in contact about the weird, wonderful and wild parts of the market.

So when he dropped an email into my lap yesterday about AI, I was intrigued. The heading of the email was ā€œStock footage comes aliveā€ and I was confident that I knew what this was about.

A lot has been said about the speed at which AI is advancing ā€“ weā€™re witnessing it first hand, right here at AI Collision šŸ’„.

And one of the fastest growing areas is in design and creative arts. You can now use natural language to bring any idea in your mind to life by simply asking generative AI to do it.

For example, this week I got into a WhatsApp debate with a friend about whether Die Hard was a Christmas film. I say yes, she says no. She said Home Alone is a Christmas movie, which I agree with, but that Die Hard is not.

My argument was that theyā€™re both set at Xmas, and without Xmas as part of the film, neither film takes placeā€¦

  • Without Xmas, Kevinā€™s parents donā€™t leave him home alone.

  • Without Xmas, there is no party at Nakatomi Plaza, and no Hans Gruber.

Therefore, both are Xmas films.

But rather than agree to disagree, I decided to solve the problem, the AI wayā€¦


Me: Give me a movie poster for a crossover fictional film between Home Alone and Die Hard.

ChatGPT: Hereā€™s the movie poster for the fictional crossover film between ā€œHome Aloneā€ and ā€œDie Hard,ā€ featuring a character resembling young Kevin McCallister set against the backdrop of the Nakatomi Plaza.


A movie poster for a fictional crossover film between 'Home Alone' and 'Die Hard'. The title of the movie is displayed in a bold, eye-catching font at the top. The poster features the character resembling a young Kevin McCallister from 'Home Alone', dressed in his iconic outfit, set against the backdrop of the Nakatomi Plaza from 'Die Hard'. He's holding a toy walkie-talkie and a toy machine gun, with a mischievous and determined expression. The poster has dramatic lighting and action-packed imagery, blending the playful innocence of 'Home Alone' with the intense action of 'Die Hard'. The bottom of the poster includes mock credits and a tagline that cleverly combines elements from both movies.

Yes, thatā€™s weird.

But this is where Nickā€™s email makes things even weirder.

He sent me this link to a Zero Hedge article about how ā€œshockingly goodā€ generative AI is getting.

Of note was a new ā€œmotion brushā€ beta function from Runway, a generative AI creative platform.

I had to test it outā€¦ so I didā€¦ on Home Alone x Die Hard.

Thatā€™s mega weird.

But it also got me thinkingā€¦

I decided to try it on something more real. So, I took a picture of my son when he was a baby and added the AI motion brush to that.

Iā€™m not going to upload that here ā€“ but itā€™s worth pointing out, the motion it added to the still image of him was extraordinary. It made his face move, his eyes blink and it brought a still image of him to life!

And then I thought about something else.

My mum passed away in 2009 when I was 25. My boys never got a chance to meet their Nanny (thatā€™s what she wanted to be called if she ever became a grandmother).

We have pictures, but not a lot of video. As they get older, theyā€™ll see those pictures. But what if I could bring those pictures to life using AI? What if there was some physical context to the images they see of their Nanny?

Would that be a good thing, or is that a step too farā€¦ too weird?

Iā€™m not sure where I sit with it. To date, Iā€™ve not added a picture of my mum to add AI motion to. Maybe I never will.

But some people will. It will bring the dead back to life, if only for a few seconds. And I think in the long term, it will help people through the process of whatā€™s always a challenging time.

It might feel weird today, but tomorrow, maybe with AI advancing further, itā€™s a way for people to stay connected, forever. I think weā€™ll start to see this kind of thing become a much more accepted part of society over time. I think weā€™ll see it utilised in funeral homes, at cemeteries and memorial parks, and eventuallyā€¦ in the home.

Itā€™s all coming at us quick and itā€™s hard to make heads or tails of whatā€™s right, wrong, weird or a genius idea. But thatā€™s why I want you to check out todayā€™s pollā€¦ and see just where you sit with this kind of tech creeping into life and death.

AI Gone Wild šŸ¤Ŗ

I donā€™t know if itā€™s the AI thatā€™s gone wild todayā€¦ or me.

Last week I invited you to my special event, the AI Advantage Workshop.

And I must say, when we went live with it on Tuesday, the reception we got was fantastic.

We asked people who registered for the event to give us some feedback on whether theyā€™d be keen to start using AI in their investing.

The responses were great.

Overall, the feeling is that people who tuned in to the workshop are clearly aware that AI is not going away any time soon. And that itā€™s getting more powerful by the day and finding its way into various industries.

But thereā€™s also consideration and caution for its application in markets. People know that itā€™s being used in finance and investing already; they want to learn more and think about using it for their own investmentsā€¦

However, itā€™s a difficult step to take, to actually put that into practice. The idea of handing over any amount of decision-making to what is effectively a machine is a big leap of faith to take.

Thatā€™s in part why I also asked how much capital you would consider risking when investing in AI stocks. The aim is to get you thinking about risk, AI in investing and understanding there is a convergence of the two, so that if you manage your risk appropriately, then everyone can and should have access to AI-powered investment decisions.

That was the crux of our workshop on Tuesday ā€“ the convergence of AI and human decision-making in investing. And then we explained to our viewers how you could get access to something like that.

Iā€™m hoping you saw the workshop. If you didnā€™t, if it wasnā€™t for you, thatā€™s fine too. Not everyone wants to invest or use AI in investing ā€“ that I absolutely understand.

The good news though is youā€™re aware of all this, that AI and investing literally go hand in hand now and that it is a train that is fast pulling away from the station.

Also, just as a thanks for being an AI Collision šŸ’„ subscriber, my publisher wanted to extend one final invite (and very impressive deal) to check out the work Iā€™m doing with our AI-powered investment engine, over at my investment advisory service, Predictive Edge.

He said,


ā€œI know your readers at AI Collision šŸ’„ are switched on to the potential of AI ā€“ so let them know Iā€™ll keep the doors open to them and keep a healthy discount on the table as well. But last chance, as weā€™ve got to close it off once we hit our subscriber cap.ā€


So, there it is ā€“ if you want to see what heā€™s put on the table, and what Iā€™m doing at Predictive Edge, head here to check it out.

Boomers & Busters šŸ’°

AI and AI-related stocks moving and shaking up the markets this week. (All performance data below over the rolling week).

man in black suit jacket and black pants figurine
Photo by Gilly on Unsplash

Boom šŸ“ˆ

  • Brainchip Holdings (ASX:BRN) up 18%

  • iRobot (NASDAQ:IRBT) up 20%

  • Cyngn (NASDAQ:CYN) up 18%

Bust šŸ“‰

  • Appen Ltd (ASX:APX) down 27%

  • Vicarious Surgical (NYSE:RBOT) down 15%

  • Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) down 4%

From the hive mind šŸ§ 

Artificial Polltelligence šŸ—³ļø

Itā€™s a simple, but somewhat morbid question today, and the results next week Iā€™ll be fascinated to see:

Weirdest AI image of the day

Wrong clown ā€“ r/Weirddalle

r/weirddalle - Wrong Clown.

ChatGPT quote of the day


“Deep learning is a technology that can think, and this ability will eventually lead to a general-purpose learning algorithm.” ā€“ Ilya Sutskever


Thanks for reading, see you on Tuesday. And if youā€™re enjoying our work, please like, share and leave comments below,

Sam Volkering

Editor-in-Chief
AI Collision
Leave a comment
Although Southbank Investment Research Ltd, the publisher of AI Collision is regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, the editorial content in AI Collision is not regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. The editorial content is for general information only; it gives no advice on investments and is not intended to be relied upon by individual readers in making (or not making) specific investment decisions. Your capital is at risk when you invest. Any investment decisions should be considered in relation to your own circumstances, risk tolerance and investment objectives.
Occasionally we may tell you about other information services published by Southbank Investment Research Limited which do contain content which is regulated by the FCA. When viewing this regulated content, you should review the risk warnings accompanying it. 
You can unsubscribe from AI Collision at any time by clicking the link below.
ISSN 2977-0882
Ā© 2023 Southbank Investment Research Ltd. Registered in England and Wales No 9539630. VAT No GB629 7287 94. Registered Office: 2nd Floor, Crowne House, 56-58 Southwark Street, London, SE1 1UN. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA No 706697. 
https://register.fca.org.uk
0 0 votes
Article Rating
guest

2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Philip Jones

Don’t have time to read stuff like this.

TC58

The key part of AI, is the ‘A’ part. It is and always will be artificial, although many appear to have forgotten this. A ‘re-animated’ dead person will never be real, will never be their full self…only the parts we selectively remember to include when ‘creating’ them. Westworld, black mirror…even corpse bride and the Deathly Hallows component of Harry Potter amongst many well written books explore this. COD and Fifa will never be real war or replace actually kicking a ball. Whilst gaming can become unhealthy, the recreation of the supremely unnatural starts from that position and living in a fantasy past is no way to move into the future. I always go back to Malcolm in Jurassic Park’s quote that we should consider whether we should before whether we can.

2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x