[ivory-search 404 "The search form 146633303 does not exist"]

How to profit from AI: follow the money ๐Ÿ’ธ

Welcome to AI Collision ๐Ÿ’ฅ,

In todayโ€™s collision between AI and our world:

  • Money, money, money, moooney…moooooonney!
  • $1.2 million per year in AI royalties
  • Shrek’s looking for a date

If thatโ€™s enough to get the money pumping, read onโ€ฆ

AI Collision ๐Ÿ’ฅ

Here comes the money ๐Ÿ’ธ๐Ÿ’ธ๐Ÿ’ธ

Actually, I say “here comes” but in reality, the money has been steadily flowing into AI for well over a year now.

But what’s fascinating about this particular boom compared to previous technology booms is who’s driving the spending.

A lot of money until now has been coming from the biggest companies in tech, such as Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Nvidia โ€“ not the typical higher risk, venture capital money that pumps into smaller startups.

My take is that’s because these tech giants are spending up big because this is a foundational change to how they will operate in the future. In other words, if they don’t spend up big now, the chances they sink into irrelevance in the future is remarkably high.

So yes, they have to take trillion-dollar bets (when all is said and done) on “future proofing” their existence.

And I don’t use trillions lightly there. That’s the bill they’ll each rack up over time to get themselves sorted. Already Mark Zuckerberg is on record saying they’re taking big bets, hundreds of billions of dollars, on the rollout of AI taking a long time โ€“ and as I wrote last week, even possibly scaling to infinity.

Just a reminder too, if you think AI can scale to infinity, what do you think that’s going to do to the energy markets? Do you seriously think we’ll have enough energy to meet the demand of the trillions of invested capital these tech giants are pumping into the AI system?

Not. A. Chance.

Make sure to keep an eye out on your inbox in the coming days because I’m going to be sending out a note as to how I think this problem is fixed (hint: I reckon you already know what I’m going to say โ˜ข๏ธ) and the stocks which I think will exploded fastest and highest as the world’s energy markets are completely reshaped because of AI.

Anyway, back to the money flow. If we’re seeing the big tech giants spending up big, then it’s fair to expect that VC money and all global investment capital is going to find its way into AI opportunities.

In fact, I would suggest this second wave of AI is going to blow the roof off what we’ve already seen so far. To give a little bit of insight as to how that starts to shape up, according to forecasts from the International Data Corporation (IDC) in its “Worldwide AI and Generative AI Spending Guide,”

Worldwide spending on artificial intelligence (AI), including AI-enabled applications*, infrastructure, and related IT and business services, will more than double by 2028 when it is expected to reach $632 billion

Maybe that should be $638.6 billion. Or perhaps we can expect $625.4 billion more to come?

That’s because OpenAI, the for-profit, then not-for-profit, now for-profit AI company and creator of ChatGPT, has just gone to the well for a cash injection.

And boy did it load up.

OpenAI just raised an easy $6.6 billion dollars, giving it a valuation of…

Wait for it…

Wait for it…

157 billion dollars.

Not bad for a company that only really released a public facing application (almost) two years ago.

Reports are saying the round was led by investment firm Thrive Capital, but also that Microsoft (already a big owner) and Nvidia dipped in to this round too.

As OpenAI explained in the announcement,

The new funding will allow us to double down on our leadership in frontier AI research, increase compute capacity, and continue building tools that help people solve hard problems.

We aim to make advanced intelligence a widely accessible resource.

This falls very much in line with what I’ve been saying about “infinite scaling” of AI. You should remember that the more a company like OpenAI increases “compute capacity” they’re really talking about buying more hardware.

That’s not coming from just any random chip marker eitherโ€ฆ there’s a reason Nvidia was an investor here too. And if itโ€™s buying up more AI chips, then itโ€™s also buying up data centre racking, space, connectivity, cooling, memory and everything else needed to make AI work.

So, as I say, follow the money and when you do you, very quickly see that the AI boom is on a trajectory in one direction, and it’s going to drag up a whole host of companies with it. Those that level up their AI will be the kinds of companies you’ll want to hold in the future and build your wealth on. Those that are ignoring this trend or aren’t flexible and fast enough to adapt, will be the trash of the market, so make sure you’re on the right winners

AI gone wild ๐Ÿคช

Imagine being able to use an army of AI bots to generate $1,207,128 in annual royalties.

Not working a single day more of your life, kicking back and just letting AI make you money hand over fist.

Sounds ridiculous, impossible, so far-fetched that it’s almost like AI made the story…

Well, sort of.

The story is very true, and it was certainly made by AI. Apparently, Michael Smith from North Carolina was in cahoots with the CEO of an AI music generation company to generate those massive royalties from streaming music.

In short, they uploaded their own AI-generated music, and they used an “army of bots” to generate 661,440 streams per day.

As artists are paid by the number of times their music is streamed, this very quickly added up the dollars on the royalty statement. So many dollars that itโ€™s estimated they made more than $10 million dollars from their AI bot activity.

He is now under arrest with the charges of wire fraud and money laundering levelled at him and it sounds like the FBI has a pretty robust case to send him to jail for a while I reckon.

But what is interesting is that these are already the kinds of ways in which AI can be used. Sure, it’s illegal in this case, but it gives a bit of insight as to what can be done with AI, AI agents and AI bots. I’m sure someone will figure out a legal way to do it soon enough.

Boomers & Busters ๐Ÿ’ฐ

AI and AI-related stocks moving and shaking up the markets this week. (All performance data below over the rolling week).

man in black suit jacket and black pants figurine

Boom ๐Ÿ“ˆ

  • Brainchip Holdings (ASX:BRN) up 18%
  • WiMi Hologram Cloud (NASDAQ:WIMI) up 16%
  • Bigtincan Holdings (ASX:BTH) up 12%

Bust ๐Ÿ“‰

  • Predictive Oncology (NASDAQ:POAI) down 18%
  • Symbotic Inc (NASDAQ:SYM) down 7%
  • Samsung Electronics (KOR:A005930) down 6%

From the hive mind ๐Ÿง 

  • I think that one of the biggest winners from the AI boom just might be Meta. In fact, it probably will be Meta. Itโ€™s gone hard at AI from the outset. And itโ€™s injecting it into every aspect of its operations. Its latest release is now doing AI clips that are getting closer and closer to movie quality โ€“ maybe Meta AI Studios is next on the cards?
  • And just like that, Microsoft is passed and Nvidia is on track for the number one spot…
  • This has been a hot topic of discussion at Southbank Research โ€“ should we use it, should we shy away from it? I am interested in your thoughts on it which you can add below. But it’s Google’s new AI wizardry that allows you to feed AI information and then have it create a podcast for you. Maybe this works when looking to summarise a lengthy recommendation or article? Or maybe it’s too detached from reality. I don’t know yet. As I say very keen to get your thoughts, but first check it out I reckon.

Artificial Polltelligence ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ

We’re looking back to our poll from last week about whether or not Nvidia would be the kind of stock you’d want to profit from now, or whether you’d buy it for generations long after you’re gone from this earth.

After all, if AI scales to infinity and spending never ends, and Nvidia maintains its technology lead, is there really a cap on how high it can go?

Itโ€™s worth a deep think about, which is why we asked the question…

And here’s what you said:

It was close โ€“ close enough to think that maybe the third answer should have been, some for now, some for later.

A new poll will be with you on Thursday.

Weirdest AI image of the day

What if [Character] have a Tinder account โ€“ r/weirddalle

ChatGPTโ€™s random quote of the day

“Sometimes the best way to solve a problem is to stop participating in the problem.” โ€” Anonymous Tech Industry Saying

Thanks for reading, and donโ€™t forget to leave comments and questions below,

Sam Volkering

Editor-in-Chief
AI Collision
Although Southbank Investment Research Ltd, the publisher of AI Collision is regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, the editorial content in AI Collision is not regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. The editorial content is for general information only; it gives no advice on investments and is not intended to be relied upon by individual readers in making (or not making) specific investment decisions. Appropriate independent advice should be obtained before making any such decision.
From time to time we may tell you about other information services published by Southbank Investment Research Limited which do contain content which is regulated by the FCA. When viewing that regulated content, you should review the risk warnings accompanying it. 
If you have any questions you can call us on 0203 514 2487 Monday to Friday, 10am – 5pm. 
ISSN 2977-0882
If you would like to unsubscribe from AI Collision please click here.
Full details of our complaints procedure, privacy policy and terms and conditions can be found on our website, www.southbankresearch.com.
ยฉ 2024 Southbank Investment Research Ltd. Registered in England and Wales No 9539630. VAT No GB629 7287 94. Registered Office: Basement, 95 Southwark Street, London SE1 0HX. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA No 706697. 
https://register.fca.org.uk
0 0 votes
Article Rating
guest

2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Alan Proctor

Wont it also drag up all industries eventually and provide productivity gains and whilst a more than prorata approach to AI is advisable it should still only be part a
of a diversified risk and volatility controlled portfolio?
If it follows internet historical profile then more losers than winners, easy in hindsight not at the time.
Regards
Alan

Alan Proctor

Strange that healthcare and related stocks falling when they are most likely most important beneficiaries of AI.
Funny old world as graveside would have said

2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x